Close

Boston Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Massachusetts Defendant Loses Appeal in Rape Case, Despite Argument Regarding Biased Jury

In a recent case coming out of a Massachusetts court, the defendant lost his appeal challenging convictions of two counts of rape. The defendant’s argument centered around the jury selection process prior to his trial; according to the defendant, several of the jurors were too biased to be fair and…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Denies Defendants’ Appeals in Wiretap Case

In a recent case coming out of a Massachusetts court, five codefendants appealed their drug-related convictions. According to the defendants, the wiretap warrants that law enforcement agencies used in their investigation were unconstitutional, thus the evidence discovered as a result of these warrants should have been suppressed. The court considered…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Clarifies Five-Year Prison Minimum for Defendants Convicted of Failure to Register as Sex Offender

In a recent case coming out of a Massachusetts court, the defendant was found guilty of failing to register as a sex offender. Originally, the judge in the defendant’s case proposed a sentence of one to two years in prison; however, in response to this proposal, the higher court in…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Discusses Tower Dumps and Investigators’ Use of Cell Phone Data in Recent Robbery Case

In a recent case involving investigators’ use of individuals’ cell phone data, a Massachusetts court determined that law enforcement infringed on the defendant’s privacy rights by using his cell phone provider’s data without first asking his permission. The court suppressed part of the incriminating evidence that had been presented against…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court and Defendant Disagree Over Use of Shapchat Video in Firearm Case

In a recent firearm case coming out of a Massachusetts court, the defendant’s appeal of his guilty verdict was denied. The defendant argued that part of the evidence presented against him, an incriminating Snapchat video, should not have been admissible at trial. The court disagreed with the defendant’s argument and…

Updated:

Massachusetts Defendant Prevails in Firearm Case, Successfully Arguing Motion to Suppress

In a recent case coming out of a Massachusetts court, the defendant argued that officers did not have a legal reason to conduct a traffic stop of his vehicle. Because the officers had no reason to conduct the stop, the incriminating evidence that the officers found during the traffic stop…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Denies Defendant’s Motion to Suppress in Fraud Case

In a recent opinion having to do with fraudulent credit cards, a Massachusetts court reversed the lower court’s decision granting a defendant’s motion to suppress. The defendant was charged with several crimes, one of which was possession of counterfeit credit cards. The defendant had argued that incriminating evidence supporting this…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Reverses Lower Court’s Ruling, Denying Motion to Suppress in Firearm Case

In a recent firearm case from a Massachusetts court, the defendant’s motion to suppress incriminating evidence was denied. A lower court had originally granted the defendant’s motion, deciding the police officer that originally stopped him did not have sufficient reason to suspect that he was carrying a gun. Disagreeing with…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Denies Defendant’s Appeal in Social Media Case, Despite Argument Over Privacy Rights on Snapchat

In a recent opinion from a Massachusetts court regarding firearms offenses, the defendant’s appeal of his guilty verdict was dismissed with no relief. The defendant had originally been found illegally possessing firearms after an undercover police officer connected with him on Snapchat and saw videos of him carrying a revolver.…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Denies Defendant’s Appeal in Assault and Carjacking Case

In a recent opinion from a Massachusetts court, the defendant’s appeal of his convictions connected to an armed assault and carjacking was denied. The defendant argued in his appeal that the procedures that officers used to identify him as the person who committed the assault and carjacking were unnecessarily suggestive.…

Contact Us