Close

Boston Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Massachusetts Court of Appeals Reiterates that Juveniles Cannot be Questioned Outside the Presence of an Interested Adult

Juveniles who commit or are accused of criminal conduct are often victims of a difficult and unsupported life, leading them into a criminal lifestyle. In Massachusetts, juvenile criminal law is not designed merely to punish criminal conduct but to address the underlying factors that led juveniles into a criminal lifestyle.…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Denies Motion to Suppress Incriminating Evidence Obtain During Traffic Stop

In a recent opinion from a Massachusetts court involving a motor vehicle stop, the defendants’ request for evidence to be suppressed was denied. The defendants were found guilty of possession with intent to distribute class A substance as well as conspiracy to violate a drug law. They appealed, arguing the…

Updated:

Massachusetts Supreme Court Affirms Second-Degree Murder Convictions on Appeal

Homicide trials, especially those that appear to be gang-related, can garner a large amount of publicity. This exposure can place a lot of pressure on prosecutors to “win” a conviction and look good in the public eye. Although trials are not meant to be a spectacle purposed to make prosecutors…

Updated:

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Important Opinion Affecting Massachusetts’ Police Officers Ability to Pursue Suspects

Massachusetts police departments and prosecutors regularly rely on exceptions to the general rule requiring a warrant to enter the home of a suspect in order to collect evidence or make an arrest. As courts have carved out exceptions to the warrant requirement, police eagerly use them to make their jobs…

Updated:

Massachusetts Supreme Court Rules Against the Commonwealth in Discovery Dispute

When pursuing criminal prosecutions, the government is required to disclose evidence in their possession or control that could clear the defendant from guilt. This obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to a defendant or their lawyer is to ensure fairness in our justice system. Prosecutors are supposed to seek the truth,…

Updated:

Recent Supreme Court Rulings Weaken “Implied Consent” Justification for Blood-Alcohol Tests

Jurisdictions across the country, including in Massachusetts, have relied on legal loopholes referred to as implied consent laws to allow law enforcement officers to obtain a blood-alcohol test from a suspect without a warrant. Implied consent laws generally function as a part of the motor vehicle licensing code and have…

Updated:

Court Rejects Defendant’s Appeal Seeking Motion to Suppress in Massachusetts Gun Case

Recently, the Appeals Court of Massachusetts affirmed a lower court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The case arose when the Worcester Police were granted a search warrant for the defendant’s apartment and followed the defendant as he was seen leaving the apartment building in a motor vehicle.…

Updated:

Conviction Reversed After Defendant Challenges Admission of GPS Evidence at Trial

Over the last half-century, the widespread use of global positioning systems (GPS) technology has supplemented the toolkits used by law enforcement and prosecutors for investigating and prosecuting crimes. Although GPS technology is widespread and generally accepted as accurate for most location monitoring applications, the use of the technology by prosecutors…

Updated:

Massachusetts Supreme Court Denies Defendant’s Petition Challenging Joinder of Criminal Charges

In certain instances, a person charged with a Massachusetts criminal offense may wish to appeal a court ruling before his or her case has gone to trial and resulted in a final conviction. Such appeals of intermediate rulings, known as interlocutory appeals, can be useful in preventing a defendant’s rights…

Updated:

Massachusetts Court Weighs in on Admissibility of Expert Witness Testimony in Recent Assault and Battery Case

The Supreme Judicial Court recently reversed a defendant’s Massachusetts assault and battery conviction, finding that the trial court made a prejudicial error in excluding the defendant’s expert witness. After an altercation with two men, the court indicted the appellant on two counts of assault and battery by means of a…

Contact Us