Massachusetts Defendant Argues Confession was Involuntary in Murder Case; Higher Court Disagrees, Affirming Guilty Conviction

In a recent criminal case in Massachusetts, a defendant appealed his guilty conviction for murder in the first degree. On appeal, the defendant argued that the officers had coerced him into providing a confession of guilty; the higher court, however, ruled that the confession was entirely voluntary.

The court’s opinion highlights the fact that without an attorney present, it is always best to refrain from admitting to having committed a crime. Competent, aggressive representation is helpful at any phase of a criminal case, but especially during the interrogation process. Here, having waived the right to an attorney and having instead chosen to continue the conversation with police officers, the defendant voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court affirmed his guilty verdict.

Facts of the Case

According to the opinion, this case began when the defendant entered a married couple’s home, stabbed the couple, and stole several of the couple’s valuables. One of the victims immediately died from the incident, and the second died approximately one month later. The day after the attack, surveillance from a nearby store showed the defendant using one of the victim’s debit cards, and police officers took the defendant in for questioning.
During the questioning, the defendant immediately admitted to having committed the attack. The defendant was charged with murder, and his case went to trial. After trial, the jury announced a guilty verdict, and the defendant was sentenced accordingly. He promptly appealed.

The Decision

On appeal, the defendant argued that his confession to the officers following the attack was inadmissible in court because he made the statement involuntarily. He asked the higher court to review the record and find that the officers had coerced him into providing the statement and that the officers had violated his personal freedoms by forcing him to confess.

The court reviewed the trial court’s record regarding the interrogation. Here, said the court, the interrogation only lasted one hour, and the tone was more conversational than adversarial. The officers provided the proper Miranda warnings, advising the defendant that he had the right to remain silent and had the right to an attorney. The defendant appeared competent, healthy, and able to speak for himself throughout the entire interrogation. There were no facts that made the court think the confession was coerced, and the court was, therefore, unable to find that the officers had forced the defendant to confess.

With that, the court denied the defendant’s appeal, affirming the original guilty verdict.

Are You Looking for a Criminal Defense Attorney in Massachusetts?

At the Law Office of Patrick J. Murphy, we believe that when your future and your freedoms are at stake, it’s our job to fight to make sure your voice is heard. We offer personalized and aggressive criminal defense representation that advocates vigorously on your behalf. For a free and confidential consultation, give us a call at 617-367-0450. You can also fill out our online “contact us” form to have an attorney reach out to you as soon as possible.

Contact Information